http://roberttercek.com/2009/05/05/vectors-of-change-in-television-and-new-media-video-of-speech-from-5d/ Robert Tercek's views on innovation in the digital domain Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:47:37 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://roberttercek.com/2009/05/05/vectors-of-change-in-television-and-new-media-video-of-speech-from-5d/comment-page-1/#comment-161 George Patience Sun, 17 May 2009 21:15:53 +0000 http://roberttercek.com/?p=122#comment-161 I watched your Blender speech. You get it...90% of the decision makers dont, or wont. One curious observation/question...You pointed out the fluidity of media - and the current facade's that exemplifiy a "tired" media model...then why is what I've read about OWN reflect that same restrictive concept? I would think that if the content can and is dynamic and respects no boundaries, then wouldnt the same apply to a "Network"? ie; the audience/viewsers become/are the " programming directors, and the unique "access to, or enhancements of" content, no matter the content provider or where or how it's seen, create the percieved/real value? ie; You air "star trek" reruns,and I "air" star trek reruns, but my enhancement/accessability is faster or funnier or scarier than yours...and now the audience dictates who gets paid...and all of a sudden your advertisers want the "cool" version, (because that's whats being watched) you provide my/enhanced reruns, and without compromising bandwith or realestate, my rerun gets the increased exposure and accompaning revenue. dare I say viral broadcasting?... And that vision has not been expressed in any press re; OWN. I'de like to hear your thoughts on this. I watched your Blender speech. You get it…90% of the decision makers dont, or wont.
One curious observation/question…You pointed out the fluidity of media – and the current facade’s that exemplifiy a “tired” media model…then why is what I’ve read about OWN reflect that same restrictive concept? I would think that if the content can and is dynamic and respects no boundaries, then wouldnt the same apply to a “Network”? ie; the audience/viewsers become/are the ” programming directors, and the unique “access to, or enhancements of” content, no matter the content provider or where or how it’s seen, create the percieved/real value? ie; You air “star trek” reruns,and I “air” star trek reruns, but my enhancement/accessability is faster or funnier or scarier than yours…and now the audience dictates who gets paid…and all of a sudden your advertisers want the “cool” version, (because that’s whats being watched) you provide my/enhanced reruns, and without compromising bandwith or realestate, my rerun gets the increased exposure and accompaning revenue. dare I say viral broadcasting?…
And that vision has not been expressed in any press re; OWN. I’de like to hear your thoughts on this.

]]>